The Integrity Framework

Case studies

The framework, walked.

Case studies show the framework working in real situations. Two kinds, both useful for different reasons.

  • External cases walk publicly-reported failures through the framework and ask: would the framework have caught this? Teaching material, citing public reporting.
  • Internal cases are real audits of products in the Startvest portfolio. They show the framework operating as intended and, occasionally, what happens when reality finds a gap in the framework itself.

External — public reporting · 2026-04-25

Delve, walked through the framework

First public case study under v1.0. Walks the publicly-reported allegations against Delve, an AI compliance startup separated from Y Combinator in April 2026, through the five failure modes and the six-row vendor scorecard. Score: 0 / 6.

Read the case study →

Internal — portfolio audit · 2026-04-28

FieldLedger, the first portfolio audit

Second case study. The Integrity Framework applied to a Startvest product. 14 PASS / 5 PARTIAL or NEEDS UPDATE / 1 DEFERRED / 0 FAIL across 20 dimensions. The audit also surfaced two false negatives in the framework's own rule set, which were revised in base manifest v1.3.0 and v1.4.0.

Read the case study →

What comes next

Each subsequent portfolio audit becomes a case study. ClarityLift, IdeaLift, ADAComplianceDocs, HirePosture, MA, and PRAPI are queued in that rough order. We publish the audit log even when the result is uncomfortable — the framework is worthless if its operators don't score themselves against it.

External case suggestions welcome at integrity@startvest.ai. We work from public reporting only.